|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
TOP STORIESRevenge of the nerds – quants move to the front office29 July 2008COMMENTSTrue quants will never make it big in finance..you cant build a machine to predict "black swans" Read all comments »A surge in quantitative investing from the buy-side is driving an increase in technology spend for the sector and moving quant analysts’ roles into the front office.
Hedge funds and asset managers are increasingly turning to the quant approach in the face of unprecedented volatility in financial markets. This is fuelling appetite for new algorithms and the technology that can assist in the selection and creation of portfolios, according to a new report by consultancy Aite Group.
And this search for alpha is meaning the quant analysts, who would typically research theories and pass them on to portfolio managers and traders, are increasingly becoming a front office presence.
John Jay, an analyst at Aite Group, says: “Today’s quants are no longer development geek-types who remain hidden in the background. They are increasingly being pushed into the front office, taking the roles of traders and portfolio managers.”
And, as the quants’ roles evolve, a crop of technology vendors – such as 4th Story, ClariFI and QuantHouse - have sprung up to provide platforms for the buy-side.
Sang Lee, managing partner at Aite Group, tells us: “Still a lot of quants have developed their own platforms or applications, often on an ad hoc basis.” The new platforms are aimed at integrating these home-grown applications, he says.
Aite predicts that the market for these new alpha-generating platforms will reach $120m by 2010 – 10 times the amount spent on them in 2006.
COMMENTSFund99, Tue 29 Jul 08True quants will never make it big in finance..you cant build a machine to predict "black swans"..its like goldman sachs quant fund which predicted the credit crunch was something like as probable as winning the lottery 10 times in a row! (complete bullsh!t) Any model that comprises of inputs that have ASSUMED distribution is liable to break (e.g. monte carlo) Think about it, where would the credit crunch rank in a distribution which is modelled on historical data. However, portfolio managers who used their common sense would have realised there was a bubble in the global housing markets before it burst (any many did including PMs at my firm). Like smart PMs who realised there is a commodity bubble at the moment (which has partly burst). This is the problems with quants, they tend to be high on mathematical ability but low on common sense (specifically common sense regarding economics and the world around them). Therefore true quants will never become great PMs because when sh!t hits the fan their models breakdown, whilst common sense PMs knows when trouble is around the corner through really understanding markets/economics, and therefore act proactively to limit/mitigate damage Add your comment »Ben Lee, HR & Recruitment, Wed 30 Jul 08I disagree.
Ed, Information Technology, Wed 30 Jul 08Good god, you ever thought the stock market was anything other than a load of spiv's and wide boys. Ha Ha Ha. Add your comment »Scott, Equities, Wed 30 Jul 08In my experience, irrespective of your style/methodology the markets will always find a way to hurt you so risk management is arguably most important (and I'm no risk manager!!) Add your comment »John, Trading, Wed 30 Jul 08Risk/money management are paramount, no matter how fancy the systems/techniques are. They help the ease the pain of being hurt as mentioned above! Add your comment »Fund99, Wed 30 Jul 08Ben please read my post again.
Steve99, Credit, Thu 31 Jul 08@fund99: this is total bullshit. I am sure many of your PMs have predicted the credit crunch - the whole market predicted a credit crunch, just nobody knew when.
Warren Buffer, Asset Management, Thu 31 Jul 08Let's cut the nonsense and here is a definitive argument.
Fund99, Thu 31 Jul 08agree with Warren Buffer..
|
|||||
|
|
|||||